Why the sentence misleads 那句话为什么会误导人
“Talks to” is a statement about rules, not about wiring. Both sides agree on what a packet looks like, what an acknowledgement means, when to resend. Agreeing is not connecting. 「通信」说的是规矩,不是接线。两边说好包长什么样、确认是什么意思、什么时候重发——说好,不等于连上。
You post a letter. Inside it you wrote to your friend — that is the layer that “talks to” them. But the letter goes into a courier bag, the bag goes onto a truck, and the truck is the only thing that actually moves. Your friend unloads, unwraps, then reads, in the opposite order. You and your friend never touched. Neither did the two bags. 你寄一封信。信里写的是给朋友的话——那一层「和他通信」。可信要装进快递袋,袋要上卡车,真正在动的只有卡车。朋友那边按相反的顺序来:先卸车,再拆袋,最后读信。你和朋友从头到尾没碰过面,两个快递袋也没有。
What it looks like drawn honestly 老实画出来是这样
Draw the agreement as what it is — a name both sides know — and the picture stops lying. Then follow one transfer through it. 把「约定」按它本来的样子画出来——一个两边都认的名字——图就不再说假话了。然后跟着一笔传输走一遍。